Perhaps I’m not paranoid enough, or just plain ignorant (I haven’t read a word of any proposed legislation or regulation), and being repetitive, but the semi-sane meaning of “neutral and legal” would be that one may be non-neutral (again, whatever that means exactly) in the case of infringing, not that one must discriminate against infringing content (whatever one means by that!). I realize that’s not how “neutral and legal” parses, so again I plead possible ignorance and under-paranoia.

So just to be clear, is there any evidence or semi-solid hearsay that NN legislation is being used to sneak in mandatory filtering? That would totally not surprise me, other than not having more noise about it.