- Maintained on an ongoing basis
- Global reach
- Translated
- Professional-level musicology
This territory is held by proprietary interests, including data vendors like All Music Guide (Rovi) and Gracenote, as well as music service providers like Spotify and Apple Music.
Maybe that shouldn’t surprise me. The great care and patient labor to create such a data set is generally not a good match for crowdsourcing. Crowds can do amazing things, but they are not methodical.
The Baroque entry in DBPedia is an interesting parallel.
Maybe I have bias from my time in the commercial music data world, and DBPedia is highly competitive. The entries for Jump Blues and Rockabilly, and their relationships, are excellent.
DBPedia has a single genre map for the whole world, I believe. (It might be scoped within a language, so that genre relationships don’t span more than one language).
This is a problem because genres mean different things in different cultures. Highlife is World Music in the US but Palm-wine music at home.
There could be a graph (“genre map”) which is a superset of all graphs, but it wouldn’t be coherent. There would be multiple roots or starting points, the same genre would appear in multiple locations, the same genre name might be used in different ways.
In terms of data modeling, there needs to be one simple change in DBPedia: add an identifier for the cultural context to the the music genre class.