Jeff Atwood said
He’s wrong that it makes zero engineering sense.
For example, browser-based mail apps like Hotmail were originally much worse than client side ones like Eudora. But huge advances have been made in these apps, and now client side mail readers like Outlook are clearly lagging edge in comparison to ajax apps like Gmail. It’s not just ancient rotting hulks like Outlook; even relatively recent client-side mailers like Mail.app aren’t as good as the best web mail apps.
Any application that can be written on the web stack will eventually surpass the same application on the client-side stack.
Why do web apps interate faster? My intuition is that it’s about the size of the community of developers attacking technical obstacles. On the web you aren’t the only engineer blocked by Problem X. There are huge numbers of other engineers stuck there. All these engineers swarm the problems and knock them down. The near-instant speed of deployment of new code (especially in a shop using continuous integration) takes over and allows each incremental solution to go live. Then the transparency of web coding enables the innovation to spread: engineers discover one another’s solutions, read the source (which is always available), and copy the innovation. And this applies to virtually every aspect of the web stack, so that all of these innovations accumulate to the benefit of all web apps.
It is sometimes more technically difficult to write applications that rely on internet standards rather than client-side conventions. That creates the impression that the client-side approach is better engineering. But the client-side approach can rarely accomplish as much.
One thought on “web programs end up better”
Agreed. In the end, it’s not a technology argument, but one concerning which options have the critical mass to stand being driven forward at the speed necessary to properly represent the fastest-changing part of the web. In the end, the only credible candidate is the Universal Client that is the Web Stack. Issues of interpreted vs compiled, performance etc are irrelevant as it will all end up in hardware anyway.